Japan-North Korea Relations
December 16, 2015
Talks between Japan and North Korea on the Abductions Issue
1. First Japan-DPRK Summit Meeting (September 2002)
At the first Japan-DPRK summit meeting held on September 17, 2002, Kim Jong-Il, Chairman of the National Defense Commission of North Korea, finally admitted, after years of denial, that the abductions of Japanese citizens took place and apologized. He also stated that among 13 abduction victims, four were alive, eight were dead and for one, entrance into North Korea could not be confirmed. In addition, he acknowledged the abduction of Hitomi Soga, who wasn’t on the list for the investigation requested by the Japanese Government and confirmed that she was alive (On the other hand, he claimed that as a result of a subsequent investigation, Miyoshi Soga, Hitomi Soga’s mother who had disappeared at the same time, had not entered North Korea.) Moreover, while promising to punish those responsible and to prevent any recurrence, Kim assured Japan that he would facilitate meetings between the victims and their families as well as the return of victims to Japan.
In response, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi strongly protested to Kim Jong-Il, Chairman of the National Defense Commission, and demanded the continuation of an investigation, the return of those alive, and the prevention of any recurrence.
2. Dispatch of the Investigation Team of the Government of Japan (September and October 2002)
From September 28 to October 1, 2002, the Government of Japan dispatched an investigation team that met with victims and strived to collect information on abductees who have not yet been accounted for. Unfortunately, the information provided by North Korea was limited right from the start and inconsistent and dubious on many points. For example, North Korea handed over materials it claimed were the remains of Kaoru Matsuki, but forensic analyses showed that these remains were those of someone else. At the 12th round of the negotiations to normalize diplomatic relations between Japan and North Korea held from October 29 to 30, 2002 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, the Government of Japan posed 150 questions concerning inconsistencies in the information provided by North Korea and requested more information, but did not receive an adequate response from North Korea.
3. The Return of Five Abductees (October 2002)
On October 15, 2002, five victims (Yasushi and Fukie Chimura, Kaoru and Yukiko Hasuike, and Hitomi Soga) returned to Japan and were finally reunited with their families.
With the consideration that the five victims returned to Japan should be provided with an environment in which they were free to determine their own future and the future of their families who were still in North Korea, on October 24, 2002, the Government of Japan announced that the five victims would remain in Japan. The Government also strongly urged North Korea to ensure the safety of their family members still in North Korea and to promptly set a date for their return to Japan.
4. Second Japan-DPRK Summit Meeting (May 2004)
On May 22, 2004, then Prime Minister Koizumi visited North Korea for the second time and engaged in discussions with Kim Jong-Il, Chairman of the National Defense Commission, concerning the abductions and other bilateral issues, as well as security issues such as North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs. Regarding the abductions issue, the two leaders agreed to the following points during their meeting:
- North Korea agrees to allow all five family members of Yasushi and Fukie Chimura, and of Kaoru and Yukiko Hasuike to return to Japan on the day of the summit meeting.
- North Korea would promptly resume reinvestigations from scratch in order to provide a full account of the truth.
Based on this agreement, all five members of the families of Yasushi and Fukie Chimura and of Kaoru and Yukiko Hasuike returned to Japan with Prime Minister Koizumi. Three family members of Hitomi Soga subsequently arrived in Japan on July 18, 2004.
5. Japan-North Korea Working-Level Consultations (2004, August and September in Beijing; November in Pyongyang)
(a) The Japan-North Korea Working-Level Consultations were held in Beijing in August (1st round) and September (2nd round) 2004. North Korea presented the preliminary results of its ongoing investigations into the abductees whose whereabouts remain unknown, but no concrete evidence or documentation to support the presented information was provided.
(b) The third Japan-North Korea Working-Level Consultations took place in November of the same year. They lasted for more than 50 hours and included a question-and-answer session with the Investigation Committee of North Korea, along with direct interviews with a total of 16 alleged witnesses and the onsite inspection of facilities and other locations related to the abductions. Evidentiary materials such as the remains that North Korea claimed to be those of Megumi Yokota were also collected. Moreover, at these Consultations, Japan requested that the North Korean Government provide relevant information on five of the missing people whom the Government of Japan has not identified as abductees, but who might have been abducted by North Korea (“missing Japanese probably related to North Korea”). The North Korean side, however, responded that it had been unable to confirm that the five people had entered North Korea. (The Japanese Government repeatedly demands at consultations and during any other opportunity that the North Korean Government provide relevant information about cases where the possibility of abduction by North Korea cannot be dismissed).
(c) The Government of Japan immediately conducted a close examination of the information and physical evidence presented by North Korea at the third Consultations, and concluded that there was no evidence to support the explanation given by the North Korean side that “eight had died and two were not confirmed to have entered North Korea.” Moreover, the information and physical evidence provided to date so far has brought up numerous questions, and DNA testing on part of the remains claimed to be those of Megumi Yokota have indicated their DNA belongs to someone else. The Government of Japan addressed these inconsistencies and firmly protested to North Korea.
6. Japan-North Korea Comprehensive Talks (February 2006: Beijing)
The consultation on the abductions issue at the Japan-North Korea Comprehensive Talks held in February 2006 extended for a total of approximately 11 hours, and Japan once again resolutely demanded the return to Japan of the surviving abductees, the launch of a new investigation aimed at revealing the truth about what had happened, and extraditing those responsible for the abductions. In response, North Korea repeated the same explanation it had previously given that “all of the abductees who are still alive have already returned to Japan.” Regarding the search for the truth, Pyongyang did not vow to continue investigations into the abductees whose whereabouts are unknown and refused to extradite those responsible.
7. Working Group on the Normalization of Japan-North Korea Relations (March 2007: Hanoi, September 2007: Ulaanbaatar)
The first meeting of the Working Group on the Normalization of Japan-North Korea Relations, which was established at the Six-Party Talks in February 2007, was held in March of the same year. The Government of Japan reiterated its demands for the securing of the safety of all abductees and their families and their swift return, a full account of the truth in all abduction cases, and the extradition of those responsible. North Korea, however, failed to show good faith towards the resolution of the abductions issue by again repeating its position that “the abductions issue has already been resolved.” Neither was there substantial progress achieved on the abductions issue at the second meeting of the Working Group held in September.
8. Japan-North Korea Working-Level Consultations (June 2008: Beijing, August 2008: Shenyang)
(a) At the Japan-North Korea Working-Level Consultations in June 2008, Japan urged North Korea to take specific actions towards the resolution of pending issues of concern, including the abductions, by explaining that Japan would be ready to partially lift sanctions against North Korea if North Korea takes such actions. Japan also once again insisted that all abductees should be returned, a full account should be provided, and suspects should be handed over. Consequently, North Korea changed its existing position that “the abductions issue has already been resolved” and promised to reinvestigate the abductions issues in order to take concrete actions towards the resolution of the issue.
(b) At the Working-Level Consultations in August of that year, the two parties held candid discussions about the actions agreed upon at the Consultations in June, focused on how the reinvestigation of the abductions issue should be conducted by North Korea. As a result, both parties agreed that North Korea should create an authorized investigation committee and start a full-scale investigations on all abduction victims in order to find and return them. Japan for its part announced that the government was prepared to remove sanctions on travel and chartered flights to and from North Korea as soon as North Korea launched their investigations.
(c) Nevertheless, on September 4, 2008, North Korea notified Japan that, although they would still maintain the position of implementing the measures agreed upon during the Working-Level Consultations, they would postpone the launch of their investigations until they examine how the new Government of Japan would act in regards to the agreement after its sudden change of the administration (i.e. the resignation of then-Prime Minister Fukuda).
9. Japan-North Korea Intergovernmental Consultations (November 2012: Ulaanbaatar)
In November 2012, the Japan-North Korea Intergovernmental Consultations, which were the first consultations with North Korea in four years, were held. At the meeting, the two parties held in-depth discussions on the abductions issue and came to an agreement to continue deliberations in the future for further review in consideration of past progress and for discussion on individual points of view. In addition, the Japanese side brought up for discussion to North Korea the cases where the possibility of abduction by North Korea cannot be dismissed.
The second Consultations were scheduled for December 5 and 6, but Japan had no choice but to postpone the meeting due to North Korea announced a missile launch on December 1.
10. Japan-North Korea Intergovernmental Consultations (March 2014; Beijing)
On March 3, 19 and 20, 2014, Japanese and North Korean officials held informal talks (director level) on the sidelines of meetings between the Japanese and North Korean Red Cross Societies in Shenyang, China for the first time in a year and four months. It was decided to make coordinations to resume official talks.
Subsequently, official talks between Japan and North Korea were held in Beijing, China, on March 30 and 31. Wide-ranged exchanges of views concerning issues of interest of either side took place in a sincere and candid manner, and it was concurred to continue the consultations.
11. Japan-North Korea Intergovernmental Consultations (May 2014; Stockholm)
In May 2014, Japan-North Korea Intergovernmental Consultations were held in Stockholm, Sweden. North Korea promised to conduct comprehensive and full-scale investigation on all Japanese nationals, including victims of abduction. Japan, in response, decided that it would lift part of its unilateral measures against North Korea at the point of time when North Korea establishes the Special Investigation Committee for the investigations and starts the investigations.
12. Japan-North Korea Intergovernmental Consultations (July 2014; Beijing)
On July 1, 2014, Japan-North Korea Intergovernmental Consultations were held in Beijing, China. North Korea explained the organization, structure, and key members of the Special Investigation Committee. Japan asked questions focused on whether the committee is authorized to investigate all relevant organizations.
On July 4, North Korea, through its state media, announced the beginning of the investigations on all Japanese nationals including the victims of abduction. It publicly announced in North Korea and abroad, the authority, structure, and investigation methods of the Special Investigation Committee that were consistent with the understanding of the Japanese side. At the same time, Japan lifted restrictions on visits of persons, special measures of restriction on North Korea regarding the amount of money requiring notification of the export of means of payments and report on the money transfer, and the embargo on the entry of North Korea flagged ships with humanitarian purpose into Japanese ports.
13. Japan-North Korea Diplomatic Authorities Meeting (September 2014; Shenyang)
On September 29, 2014, a meeting between Japan-North Korea diplomatic authorities was held in Shenyang, China, for North Korea’s explanation on the current status of the investigations. North Korea said that it was not be able to provide specific results on individual cases at this stage, but explained that, if a Japanese delegation visits Pyongyang and meet with the members of the Special Investigation Committee, they could hear clearer explanation of the current status of the investigations.
14. Consultations with the Special Investigation Committee (Oct. 2014; Pyongyang)
In October 2014, Consultations with the Special Investigation Committee were held in Pyongyang, North Korea. Japan reiterated that the resolution of the abductions issue is the most important for Japan, ensuring security of all abductees and their immediate return to Japan, providing full account of the truth in all abduction cases and the extradition of perpetrators who conducted the abductions are indispensable, and Japan seeks to find out whereabouts of victims of abduction, whether or not officially identified as such by the Government, and to have them back safely to Japan as soon as possible. Japan also strongly urged North Korea to expeditiously conduct its investigations and report the results sincerely and swiftly to Japan.
North Korea provided an explanation of the organization such as the structure of the committee and its branches. It also explained its policy to conduct objective and scientific investigations with a focus on witnesses and physical evidence and to thoroughly deepen the investigations from new angles, regardless of the past investigation results. It also explained that the Committee is invested with special authority by the National Defense Commission, the highest guiding body of North Korea, to conduct a thorough investigation of all organizations, including special agencies. Regarding the abductions issue, North Korea said that it was investigating the specific cases , including whether or not victims did enter North Korea, their living circumstances and the details of how each case took place, and that a new investigation into related places including guest houses where the victims had stayed was being carried out while looking for new physical evidence and witnesses.