Summary of the FY 2019 MOFA ODA Evaluations
Evaluations from Development Viewpoints
MOFA uses a rating scale to assess development effectiveness, aiming to produce clear and comprehensible evaluation reports.
In FY 2017, MOFA adopted an alphabetical rating scale (A to D).
This alphabetical scale may make the evaluation results easier to understand, but it can also be misleading due to its simplicity. Therefore, we recommend that readers refer to the summary of each evaluation result.
Rating scale
| Highly Satisfactory | All evaluation questions have highly satisfactory results. |
| Satisfactory | Most evaluation questions have highly satisfactory results. |
| Partially Unsatisfactory | Some evaluation questions have highly satisfactory results, although there are some issues to be resolved. |
| Unsatisfactory | Most evaluation questions do not have satisfactory results. |
- Evaluation of Japan's ODA to the Republic of the Philippines
- Evaluation of Grant Assistance for Japanese NGO Projects
- Evaluation of Japan's ODA for Women's Empowerment
- Evaluation of the SATREPS Program (Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development)
- Evaluation of Japan's Non‑Project Grant Aid for Provision of Japanese Next-Generation Eco‑Friendly Vehicles to Peru in FY 2013