TREATY ON EXTRADITION BETWEEN JAPAN AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA(No1)(SCHEDULE)

JAPAN AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

DESIRING TO MAKE MORE EFFECTIVE THE COOPERATION OF THE TWO COUNTRIES FOR THE REPRESSION OF CRIME,

HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

ARTICLE I

EACH CONTRACTING PARTY UNDERTAKES TO EXTRADITE TO THE OTHER PARTY, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS TREATY, ANY PERSON FOUND IN ITS TERRITORY AND SOUGHT BY THE OTHER PARTY FOR PROSECUTION, FOR TRIAL, OR TO EXECUTE PUNISHMENT FOR ANY OFFENSE SPECIFIED IN PARAGRAPH 1 OF ARTICLE II.  WHEN THE OFFENSE WAS COMMITTED OUTSIDE THE TERRITORY OF THE REQUESTING PARTY, THE CONDITIONS SPECIFIED IN PARAGRAPH 1 OF ARTICLE VI, INTER ALIA, SHALL BE APPLIED.

ARTICLE II

1. EXTRADITION SHALL BE GRANTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS TREATY FOR ANY OFFENSE LISTED IN THE SCHEDULE ANNEXED TO THIS TREATY, WHICH FORMS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THIS TREATY, WHEN SUCH AN OFFENSE IS PUNISHABLE BY THE LAWS OF BOTH CONTRACTING PARTIES BY DEATH, BY LIFE IMPRISONMENT, OR BY DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY FOR A PERIOD OF MORE THAN ONE YEAR; OR FOR ANY OTHER OFFENSE WHEN SUCH AN OFFENSE IS PUNISHABLE BY THE LAWS OF JAPAN AND BY THE FEDERAL LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES BY DEATH, BY LIFE IMPRISONMENT, OR BY DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY FOR A PERIOD OF MORE THAN ONE YEAR.

EXTRADITION SHALL BE GRANTED FOR ANY OFFENSE OF WHICH ONE OF THE ABOVE-MENTIONED OFFENSES IS A SUBSTANTIAL ELEMENT, EVEN IF, FOR PURPOSES OF GRANTING FEDERAL JURISDICTION TO THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, INTERSTATE TRANSPORTING, OR THE USE OF THE MAILS OR THER INTERSTATE FACILITIES IS ALSO AN  ELEMENT OF THE SPECIFIC OFFENSE.

2. IN THE CASE IN WHICH THE PERSON SOUGHT HAS BEEN SENTENCED BY A COURT OF THE REQUESTING PARTY FOR ANY OFFENSE TO WHICH PARAGRAPH 1 APPLIES, EXTRADITION SHALL BE GRANTED ONLY IF THE PERSON HAS BEEN SENTENCED TO DEATH OR IF THE SENTENCE REMAINING TO BE SERVED IS AT LEAST FOUR MONTHS.

ARTICLE III

EXTRADITION SHALL BE GRANTED ONLY IF THERE IS SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO PROVE EITHER THAT THERE IS PROBABLE CAUSE TO SUSPECT, ACCORDING TO THE LAWS OF THE REQUESTED PARTY, THAT THE PERSON SOUGHT HAS COMMITTED THE OFFENSE FOR WHICH EXTRADITION IS REQUESTED OR THAT THE PERSON SOUGHT IS THE PERSON CONVICTED BY A COURT OF THE REQUESTING PARTY.

ARTICLE IV

1. EXTRADITION SHALL NOT BE GRANTED UNDER THIS TREATY IN ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CIRCUMSTANCES:

(1) WHEN THE OFFENSE FOR WHICH EXTRADITION IS REQUESTED IS A POLITICAL OFFENSE OR WHEN IT APPEARS THAT THE REQUEST FOR EXTRADITION IS MADE WITH A VIEW TO PROSECUTING, TRYING OR PUNISHING THE PERSON SOUGHT FOR A POLITICAL OFFENSE.  IF ANY QUESTION ARISES AS TO THE APPLICATION OF THIS PROVISION, THE DECISION OF THE REQUESTED PARTY SHALL PREVAIL.

(2) WHEN THE PERSON SOUGHT HAS BEEN PROSECUTED OR HAS BEEN TRIED AND CONVICTED OR ACQUITTED BY THE REQUESTED PARTY FOR THE OFFENSE FOR WHICH EXTRADITION IS REQUESTED.

(3) IN THE CASE OF A REQUEST FOR EXTRADITION EMANATING FROM JAPAN, WHEN THE PROSECUTION OF THE OFFENSE FOR WHICH EXTRADITION IS REQUESTED WOULD BE BARRED BY LAPSE OF TIME, UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES.

(4) IN THE CASE OF A REQUEST FOR EXTRADITION EMANATING FROM THE UNITED STATES, WHEN THE IMPOSITION OR THE EXECUTION OF PUNISHMENT FOR THE OFFENSE FOR WHICH EXTRADITION IS REQUESTED WOULD BE BARRED BY REASONS PRESCRIBED UNDER THE LAWS OF JAPAN, INCLUDING LAPSE OF TIME;

(A) IF JAPAN WERE TO HAVE JURISDICTION OVER THE OFFENSE, OR

(B) IF JAPAN IN FACT HAS SUCH JURISDICTION AND THE TRIAL WERE TO BE HELD IN ITS COURT.

2. THE REQUESTED PARTY MAY REFUSE EXTRADITION WHEN THE PERSON SOUGHT HAS BEEN TRIED AND ACQUITTED, OR HAS UNDERGONE THE EXECUTION OF PUNISHMENT IN A THIRD STATE FOR THE OFFENSE FOR WHICH EXTRADITION IS REQUESTED.

3. WHEN THE PERSON SOUGHT HAS BEEN PROSECUTED OR HAS NOT UNDERGONE THE EXECUTION OF PUNISHMENT IN THE TERRITORY OF THE REQUESTED PARTY FOR AN OFFENSE OTHER THAN THAT FOR WHICH EXTRADITION IS REQUESTED, THE REQUESTED PARTY MAY DEFER HIS SURRENDER UNTIL THE CONCLUSION OF THE TRIAL AND THE FULL EXECUTION OF ANY PUNISHMENT HE MAY BE OR MAY HAVE BEEN IMPOSED.

ARTICLE V

THE REQUESTED PARTY SHALL NOT BE BOUND TO EXTRADITE ITS OWN NATIONALS, BUT IT SHALL HAVE THE POWER TO EXTRADITE THEM IN ITS DISCRETION.

ARTICLE VI

1. WHEN THE OFFENSE FOR WHICH EXTRADITION IS REQUESTED HAS BEEN COMMITTED OUTSIDE THE TERRITORY OF THE REQUESTING PARTY, THE REQUESTED PARTY SHALL GRANT EXTRADITION IF THE LAWS OF THAT PARTY PROVIDE FOR THE PUNISHMENT OF SUCH AN OFFENSE COMMITTED OUTSIDE ITS TERRITORY, OR IF THE OFFENSE HAS BEEN COMMITTED BY A NATIONAL OF THE REQUESTING PARTY.

2. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS TREATY, THE TERRITORY OF A CONTRACTING PARTY MEANS ALL AREAS OF LAND, WATER AND AIRSPACE UNDER THE SOVEREIGNTY OR AUTHORITY OF THAT CONTRACTING PARTY, INCLUDING ANY VESSEL REGISTERED IN THAT CONTRACTING PARTY, AND ANY AIRCRAFT REGISTERED IN THAT CONTRACTING PARTY PROVIDED THAT THE AIRCRAFT IS IN FLIGHT.  FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PROVISION AN AIRCRAFT SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE IN FLIGHT AT ANY TIME FROM THE MOMENT WHEN ALL ITS EXTERNAL DOORS ARE CLOSED FOLLOWING EMBARKATION UNTIL THE MOMENT WHEN ANY SUCH DOOR IS OPENED FOR DISEMBARKATION.

ARTICLE VII

1. THE REQUESTING PARTY SHALL NOT, EXCEPT IN ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CIRCUMSTANCES, DETAIN, PROSECUTE, TRY NOR PUNISH A PERSON SURRENDERED UNDER THIS TREATY FOR AN OFFENSE OTHER THAN THAT FOR WHICH EXTRADITION HAS BEEN GRANTED, NOR EXTRADITE HIM TO A THIRD STATE, PROVIDED THAT THESE STIPULATIONS SHALL NOT APPLY TO OFFENSES COMMITTED AFTER THE EXTRADITION:

(1) WHEN HE HAS LEFT THE TERRITORY OF THE REQUESTING PARTY AFTER HIS EXTRADITION AND HAS VOLUNTARILY RETURNED TO IT.

(2) WHEN HE HAS NOT LEFT THE TERRITORY OF THE REQUESTING PARTY WITHIN FORTY-FIVE DAYS FROM THE DAY WHEN HE HAS BEEN SET FREE TO DO SO.

(3) WHEN THE REQUESTED PARTY HAS CONSENTED TO HIS DETENTION, PROSECUTION, TRIAL OR PUNISHMENT FOR AN OFFENSE OTHER THAN THAT FOR WHICH EXTRADITION HAS BEEN GRANTED OR TO HIS EXTRADITION TO A THIRD STATE.

2. THE REQUESTING PARTY MAY DETAIN, PROSECUTE, TRY OR PUNISH THE PERSON SURRENDERED UNDER THIS TREATY FOR ANY OFFENSE FOR WHICH EXTRADITION IS TO BE GRANTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 1 OF ARTICLE II, IN SO FAR AS SUCH MEASURES ARE INSTITUTED UPON THE BASIC FACTS WHICH CONSTITUTE THE OFFENSE FOR WHICH EXTRADITION HAS BEEN GRANTED.

ARTICLE VIII

1. THE REQUEST FOR EXTRADITION SHALL BE MADE THROUGH THE DIPLOMATIC CHANNEL.

2. THE REQUEST FOR EXTRADITION SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY:

(A) DOCUMENTS WHICH DESCRIBE THE IDENTITY OF THE PERSON SOUGHT;

(B) A STATEMENT OF THE FACTS OF THE CASE;

(C) THE TEXTS OF THE LAWS DESCRIBING THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS AND THE DESIGNATION OF THE OFFENSE FOR WHICH EXTRADITION IS REQUESTED;

(D) THE TEXTS OF THE LAWS DESCRIBING THE PUNISHMENT FOR THE OFFENSE; AND

(E) THE TEXTS OF THE LAWS DESCRIBING THE TIME LIMIT ON THE PROSECUTION OR THE EXECUTION OF PUNISHMENT FOR THE OFFENSE.

3. WHEN THE REQUEST FOR EXTRADITION RELATES TO A PERSON WHO HAS NOT YET BEEN CONVICTED, IT SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY:

(A) A COPY OF THE WARRANT OF ARREST ISSUED BY A JUDGE OR OTHER JUDICIAL OFFICER OF THE REQUESTING PARTY;

(B) EVIDENCE PROVING THAT THE PERSON SOUGHT IS THE PERSON TO WHOM THE WARRANT OF ARREST REFERS; AND

(C) SUCH EVIDENCE AS WOULD PROVIDE PROBABLE CAUSE TO SUSPECT, ACCORDING TO THE LAWS OF THE REQUESTED PARTY, THAT THE PERSON SOUGHT HAS COMMITTED THE OFFENSE FOR WHICH EXTRADITION IS REQUESTED.

4. WHEN THE REQUEST FOR EXTRADITION RELATES TO A CONVICTED PERSON, IT SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY:

(A) A COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION IMPOSED BY A COURT OF THE REQUESTING PARTY;

(B) EVIDENCE PROVING THAT THE PERSON SOUGHT IS THE PERSON TO WHOM THE CONVICTION REFERS; AND

(C) (I) A COPY OF THE WARRANT OF ARREST, IF THE CONVICTED PERSON WAS NOT SENTENCED; OR

(II) A COPY OF THE SENTENCE IMPOSED AND A STATEMENT SHOWING TO WHAT EXTENT THE SENTENCE HAS NOT BEEN CARRIED OUT, IF THE CONVICTED PERSON WAS SENTENCED.

5. THE REQUEST FOR EXTRADITION SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY ALL OTHER INFORMATION AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE LAWS OF THE REQUESTED PARTY.

6. ALL THE DOCUMENTS TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE REQUESTING PARTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS TREATY SHALL BE DULY CERTIFIED AS REQUIRED BY THE LAWS OF THE REQUESTED PARTY, AND ACCOMPANIED BY A DULY CERTIFIED TRANSLATION IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE REQUESTED PARTY.

7. IF THE EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY OF THE REQUESTED PARTY CONSIDERS THAT THE INFORMATION FURNISHED IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST FOR EXTRADITION OF A PERSON SOUGHT IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO FULFILL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS TREATY, THAT AUTHORITY SHALL SO NOTIFY THE REQUESTING PARTY, IN ORDER TO ENABLE THE REQUESTING PARTY TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BEFORE THAT AUTHORITY DETERMINES WHETHER TO SUBMIT THE REQUEST TO A COURT OF THE REQUESTED PARTY.  THAT AUTHORITY MAY FIX A TIME LIMIT FOR THE SUBMISSION OF SUCH INFORMATION.

ARTICLE IX

1. IN CASE OF URGENCY THE REQUESTED PARTY MAY PROVISIONALLY DETAIN THE PERSON TO BE SOUGHT WHEN THE REQUESTING PARTY SUBMITS AN APPLICATION FOR PROVISIONAL DETENTION THROUGH THE DIPLOMATIC CHANNEL, NOTIFYING THE REQUESTED PARTY THAT A WARRANT OF ARREST HAS BEEN ISSUED OR A SENTENCE IMPOSED FOR AN OFFENSE FOR WHICH EXTRADITION IS TO BE GRANTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 1 OF ARTICLE II AND ASSURING THE REQUESTED PARTY THAT A REQUEST FOR EXTRADITION WILL BE MADE.  THE APPLICATION FOR PROVISIONAL DETENTION SHALL DESCRIBE THE IDENTITY OF THE PERSON TO BE SOUGHT AND THE FACTS OF THE CASE, AND SHALL CONTAIN SUCH FURTHER INFORMATION AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE LAWS OF THE REQUESTED PARTY.

2. IF THE REQUESTING PARTY FAILS TO PRESENT THE REQUEST FOR EXTRADITION WITHIN FORTY-FIVE DAYS FROM THE DATE OF PROVISIONAL DETENTION, THE PERSON DETAINED SHALL BE SET AT LIBERTY, PROVIDED THAT THIS STIPULATION SHALL NOT PREVENT THE REQUESTED PARTY FROM INSTITUTING A PROCEEDING WITH A VIEW TO EXTRADITING THE PERSON SOUGHT IF A REQUEST FOR EXTRADITION IS SUBSEQUENTLY RECEIVED.

ARTICLE X

WHEN A PERSON SOUGHT ADVISES A COURT OR OTHER COMPETENT AUTHORITIES OF THE REQUESTED PARTY THAT HE WAIVES HIS RIGHTS TO INTERNAL PROCEDURES REQUIRED FOR HIS EXTRADITION, THAT PARTY SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY MEASURES TO EXPEDITE THE EXTRADITION TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED UNDER ITS LAWS.

ARTICLE XI

THE REQUESTED PARTY, UPON RECEIVING REQUESTS FROM THE OTHER CONTRACTING PARTY AND FROM A THIRD STATE OR STATES FOR THE EXTRADITION OF THE SAME PERSON EITHER FOR THE SAME OFFENSE OR FOR DIFFERENT OFFENSES, SHALL DETERMINE TO WHICH OF THE REQUESTING STATES IT WILL EXTRADITE THAT PERSON.

ARTICLE XII

1. THE REQUESTED PARTY SHALL PROMPTLY COMMUNICATE TO THE REQUESTING PARTY THROUGH THE DIPLOMATIC CHANNEL THE DECISION ON THE REQUEST FOR EXTRADITION.

2. IF AN ORDER TO SURRENDER HAS BEEN ISSUED BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OF THE REQUESTED PARTY AND THE REQUESTING PARTY FAILS TO RECEIVE THE PERSON SOUGHT WITHIN SUCH TIME AS MAY BE STIPULATED BY THE LAWS OF THE REQUESTED PARTY, IT MAY SET HIM AT LIBERTY AND MAY SUBSEQUENTLY REFUSE TO EXTRADITE THAT PERSON FOR THE SAME OFFENSE.  THE REQUESTING PARTY SHALL PROMPTLY REMOVE THE PERSON RECEIVED FROM THE TERRITORY OF THE REQUESTED PARTY.

ARTICLE XIII

TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE REQUESTED PARTY AND SUBJECT TO THE RIGHT OF THIRD PARTIES, ALL ARTICLES ACQUIRED AS A RESULT OF THE OFFENSE OR WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED AS EVIDENCE SHALL BE SURRENDERED IF EXTRADITION IS GRANTED.

ARTICLE XIV

1. THE REQUESTED PARTY SHALL MAKE ALL NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS WITH RESPECT TO INTERNAL PROCEDURES, INCLUDING THE DETENTION OF THE PERSON SOUGHT, ARISING OUT OF THE REQUEST FOR EXTRADITION AND BEAR THE EXPENSES BY REASON THEREOF, PROVIDED THAT EXPENSES INCURRED FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF THE PERSON ORDERED TO BE SURRENDERED SHALL BE PAID BY THE REQUESTING PARTY.

2. THE REQUESTED PARTY SHALL NOT MAKE ANY PECUNIARY CLAIM AGAINST THE REQUESTING PARTY BY REASON OF ANY COMPENSATION PAID TO A PERSON SOUGHT FOR THE DAMAGES CAUSED TO HIM BY HIS DETENTION, EXAMINATION OR SURRENDER UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THIS TREATY.

ARTICLE XV

1. EACH CONTRACTING PARTY SHALL GRANT TO THE OTHER PARTY THE RIGHT TO TRANSPORT THROUGH ITS TERRITORY A PERSON SURRENDERED TO THE OTHER PARTY BY A THIRD STATE ON REQUEST MADE THROUGH THE DIPLOMATIC CHANNEL EXCEPT IN ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CIRCUMSTANCES:

(1) WHEN THE CRIMINAL ACT WHICH HAS GIVEN RISE TO THE EXTRADITION WOULD NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFENSE UNDER THE LAWS OF THE CONTRACTING PARTY THROUGH WHICH TRANSIT IS REQUESTED.

(2) WHEN THE CRIMINAL ACT WHICH HAS GIVEN RISE TO THE EXTRADITION IS A POLITICAL OFFENSE OR WHEN IT APPEARS THAT THE REQUEST FOR EXTRADITION IS MADE WITH A VIEW TO PROSECUTING, TRYING OR PUNISHING THE PERSON SURRENDERED FOR A POLITICAL OFFENSE.  IF ANY QUESTION ARISES AS TO THE APPLICATION OF THIS PROVISION, THE DECISION OF THE CONTRACTING PARTY THROUGH WHICH TRANSIT IS REQUESTED SHALL PREVAIL.

(3) WHEN REASONS OF PUBLIC ORDER ARE OPPOSED TO TRANSIT.

2. IN THE CASE ABOVE, THE CONTRACTING PARTY TO WHICH EXTRADITION HAS BEEN GRANTED SHALL REIMBURSE THE CONTRACTING PARTY THROUGH WHOSE TERRITORY TRANSPORTATION HAS BEEN MADE FOR ANY EXPENSES INCURRED BY THE LATTER IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH TRANSPORTATION.

ARTICLE XVI

1. THIS TREATY SHALL BE SUBJECT TO RATIFICATION AND THE INSTRUMENTS OF RATIFICATION SHALL BE EXCHANGED AT WASHINGTON AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.  IT SHALL ENTER INTO FORCE ON THE THIRTIETH DAY AFTER THE DATE OF THE EXCHANGE OF THE INSTRUMENTS OF RATIFICATION.

2. THIS TREATY SHALL ALSO APPLY TO ANY OFFENSE SPECIFIED IN PARAGRAPH 1 OF ARTICLE II COMMITTED BEFORE THIS TREATY ENTERS INTO FORCE.

3. ON THE ENTRY INTO FORCE OF THIS TREATY, THE TREATY OF EXTRADITION SIGNED AT TOKYO ON APRIL 29, 1886 AND THE SUPPLEMENTARY CONVENTION OF EXTRADITION SIGNED AT TOKYO ON MAY 17, 1906 BETWEEN JAPAN AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SHALL TERMINATE, PROVIDED THAT ANY EXTRADITION CASE PENDING IN THE REQUESTED PARTY AT THE TIME THIS TREATY ENTERS INTO FORCE SHALL REMAIN SUBJECT TO THE PROCEDURES SPECIFIED IN THE ABOVE-MENTIONED TREATY OF EXTRADITION AND THE SUPPLEMENTARY CONVENTION OF EXTRADITION.

4. EITHER CONTRACTING PARTY MAY TERNINATE THIS TREATY AT ANY TIME BY GIVING SIX MONTHS' WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE OTHER PARTY.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE UNDERSIGNED, BEING DULY AUTHORIZED THERETO BY THEIR RESPECTIVE GOVERNMENTS, HAVE SIGNED THIS TREATY.

DONE IN DUPLICATE, IN THE JAPANESE AND ENGLISH LANGUAGES, BOTH EQUALLY AUTHENTIC, AT TOKYO, THIS THIRD DAY OF MARCH, ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-EIGHT.

FOR JAPAN:

SUNAO SONODA

FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:

MICHAEL J. MANSFIELD

SCHEDULE

1.  MURDER, MANSLAUGHTER, INCLUDING CAUSING DEATH THROUGH SOLICITATION OR ASSISTANCE

2.  ASSAULT MADE WITH INTENT TO COMMIT MURDER

3.  MALICIOUS WOUNDING, INJURY OR ASSAULT

4.  ILLEGAL ABORTION

5.  ABANDONMENT WHICH CAUSES BODILY HARM OR DEATH

6.  AN OFFENSE RELATING TO KIDNAPPING, ABDUCTION OR UNLAWFUL ARREST OR IMPRISONMENT

7.  THREAT

8.  RAPE, INDECENT ASSAULT

9.  AN OFFENSE RELATING TO PANDERING OR PROSTITUTION

10.  AN OFFENSE RELATING TO OBSCENE MATERIAL

11.  BIGAMY

12.  BURGLARY

13.  ROBBERY

14.  LARCENY

15.  EXTORTION, BLACKMAIL

16.  FRAUD (OBTAINING PROPERTY, MONEY, VALUABLE SECURITIES, OR OTHER THINGS OF ECONOMIC VALUE BY FALSE PRETENSES OR BY FRAUDULENT MEANS)

17.  EMBEZZLEMENT, BREACH OF TRUST BY A PERSON WHO IS IN A FIDUCIARY RELATIONSHIP

18.  AN OFFENSE RELATING TO UNLAWFULLY OBTAINED PROPERTY

19.  AN OFFENSE RELATING TO DAMAGE OF PROPERTY, DOCUMENTS, OR FACILITIES

20.  AN OFFENSE AGAINST THE LAWS RELATING TO PROTECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY OR COPYRIGHT

21.  OBSTRUCTION OF BUSINESS BY VIOLENCE OR THREAT

22.  ARSON, BURNING THROUGH GROSS NEGLIGENCE

23.  LEADING, DIRECTING OR INCITING A RIOT

24.  AN OFFENSE AGAINST THE LAWS RELATING TO PROTECTION OF PUBLIC HEALTH

25.  AN OFFENSE ENDANGERING PUBLIC SAFETY THROUGH EXPLOSION, WATER POWER OR OTHER DESTRUCTIVE MEANS

26.  PIRACY ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF NATIONS

27.  AN OFFENSE RELATING TO UNLAWFUL SEIZURE OR EXERCISE OF CONTROL OF TRAINS, AIRCRAFT, VESSEL OR OTHER MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION

28.  AN OFFENSE INTERFERING WITH OR ENDANGERING THE NORMAL OPERATION OF TRAINS, AIRCRAFT, VESSEL OR OTHER MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION

29.  AN OFFENSE AGAINST THE LAWS RELATING TO THE CONTROL OF EXPLOSIVE SUBSTANCES, INCENDIARY DEVICES OR DANGEROUS OR PROHIBITED WEAPONS

30.  AN OFFENSE AGAINST THE LAWS RELATING TO THE CONTROL OF NARCOTIC DRUGS, CANNABIS, PSYCHOTROPIC DRUGS, COCAINE, OR THEIR PRECURSORS OR DERIVATIVES, OR OTHER DANGEROUS DRUGS OR CHEMICALS

31.  AN OFFENSE AGAINST THE LAWS RELATING TO THE CONTROL OF POISONS OR OTHER SUBSTANCES INJURIOUS TO HEALTH

32.  AN OFFENSE RELATING TO FORGERY OR COUNTERFEITING

33.  AN OFFENSE AGAINST THE LAWS RELATING TO THE CONTROL OF GAMBLING OR LOTTERIES

34.  ASSAULT OR THREAT UPON PUBLIC OFFICIAL RELATING TO THE EXECUTION OF HIS DUTY

35.  AN OFFENSE RELATING TO FALSE STATEMENTS

36.  AN OFFENSE RELATING TO PERJURY

37.  AN OFFENSE RELATING TO ESCAPE FROM CONFINEMENT OF A PERSON DETAINED OR SERVING A SENTENCE FOR AN OFFENSE SPECIFIED IN PARAGRAPH 1 OF ARTICLE II OF THIS TREATY

38.  AN OFFENSE RELATING TO OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, INCLUDING HARBORING CRIMINALS AND SUPPRESSING OR DESTROYING EVIDENCE

39.  BRIBERY

40.  AN OFFENSE RELATING TO ABUSE OF OFFICIAL AUTHORITY

41.  AN OFFENSE AGAINST THE LAWS RELATING TO THE CONTROL OF PUBLIC ELECTIONS OR POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND EXPENDITURES

42.  AN OFFENSE RELATING TO WILLFUL EVASION OF TAXES AND DUTIES

43.  AN OFFENSE AGAINST THE LAWS RELATING TO THE CONTROL OF COMPANIES OR OTHER CORPORATIONS

44.  AN OFFENSE AGAINST THE LAWS RELATING TO BANKRUPTCY OR REHABILITATION OF A COMPANY

45.  AN OFFENSE AGAINST THE LAWS RELATING TO PROHIBITION OF PRIVATE MONOPOLY OR UNFAIR BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS

46.  AN OFFENSE AGAINST THE LAWS RELATING TO THE CONTROL OF EXPORTATION AND IMPORTATION OR INTERNATIONAL TRANSFER OF FUNDS

47.  ATTEMPT, CONSPIRACY, ASSISTANCE, SOLICITATION, PREPARATION FOR, OR PARTICIPATION IN, THE COMMISSION OF ANY OF THE ABOVEMENTIONED OFFENSES

(U.S. NOTE)

EXCELLENCY,   I HAVE THE HONOUR TO REFER TO THE TREATY ON EXTRADITION BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND JAPAN SIGNED TODAY AND TO CONFIRM, ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE FOLLOWING UNDERSTANDING REACHED BETWEEN THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE TWO GOVERNMENTS:

1. THE TERM "ARRANGEMENTS" IN ARTICLE XIV OF THIS TREATY INCLUDES, FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ARRANGEMENTS FOR REPRESENTATION ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN BY APPROPRIATE LEGAL OFFICERS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND FOR JAPAN, NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS TO BE MADE BY APPROPRIATE LEGAL OFFICERS OF JAPAN FOR A REQUEST FOR EXTRADITION EMANATING FROM THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

2. NOTHING IN THIS TREATY SHALL AFFECT THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS THAT THE CONTRACTING PARTIES HAVE PURSUANT TO THE AGREEMENT UNDER ARTICLE VI OF THE TREATY OF MUTUAL COOPERATION AND SECURITY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND JAPAN, REGARDING FACILITIES AND AREAS AND THE STATUS OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES IN JAPAN SIGNED AT WASHINGTON ON JANUARY 19, 1960.

I SHOULD BE GRATEFUL IF YOUR EXCELLENCY WOULD CONFIRM THE FOREGOING UNDERSTANDING ON BEHALF OF THE GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN.

I AVAIL MYSELF OF THIS OPPORTUNITY TO RENEW TO YOUR EXCELLENCY THE ASSURANCE OF MY HIGHEST CONSIDERATION.

TOKYO, MARCH 3, 1978

MICHAEL J. MANSFIELD   AMBASSADOR EXTRAORDINARY AND PLENIPOTENTIARY OF THE UNITES STATES OF AMERICA

HIS EXCELLENCY MR. SUNAO SONODA MINISTER FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF JAPAN

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####

####