(Note 1) For country assistance evaluations and thematic evaluations.(Note 2) For evaluations of individual grant aid projects implemented by MOFA. Based on the results of the Analysis of Third-Party Evaluation of Bilateral Grant Aid Projects Conducted by MOFA and Proposal of Evaluation Methods carried out in FY2020, evaluations have been conducted using the two criteria “Relevance of Plans” and “Effectiveness of Results” since FY2021 by combining the Development and Diplomatic Viewpoints. As for the criterion “Appropriateness of Processes” that evaluates whether the processes effectively ensured the relevance of plans and effectiveness of results, it was integrated into the evaluation questions for Relevance of Plans and Effectiveness of Results, instead of being an independent evaluation criterion.Evaluation of Japan’s ODA to the Democratic Republic of Timor-LesteEvaluation of Japan’s ODA to the Republic of PeruEvaluation of Japan’s ODA to the Republic of MalawiEvaluation on Japan’s Education Cooperation Policy 2015-2020Evaluation of Japan’s Grant Aid to the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka (Economic and Social Development Programme) in FY2017Highly SatisfactoryHighly SatisfactoryHighly SatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryHighly SatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryPartially SatisfactorySatisfactoryHighly SatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory*Rating standardsHighly Satisfactory: All verification items produced highly satisfactory evaluation results.Satisfactory: Partially Satisfactory: A number of verification items produced highly satisfactory evaluation results, but there were some issues to be resolved.Unsatisfactory: Most verification items produced highly satisfactory evaluation results.Most verification items produced unsatisfactory evaluation results.In the evaluation of individual grant aid projects implemented by MOFA, the Relevance of Plans was rated “highly satisfactory,” but the Effectiveness of Results was rated “partially satisfactory” as the achievement of the goals of economic and social development of the region and support from Japanese corporations could not be verified in the short-term. In addition, partly because of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, some equipment required repairs and some necessary work had not been completed.EvaluationA total of five third-party evaluations were conducted in fiscal year 2021, consisting of three evaluations of Japan’s ODA to Timor-Leste, Peru, and Malawi, one thematic evaluation (Education Cooperation Policy), as well as one evaluation of individual grant aid projects implemented by MOFA, namely, the Evaluation of Japan’s Grant Aid to the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka (Economic and Social Development Programme) in FY2017.Relevance of Policies (Note 1)Relevance of Plans (Note 2)Evaluation Ratings from Development ViewpointsEffectiveness of ResultsAppropriateness of Processes05Annual Report on Japan’s ODA Evaluation 2022 Evaluation from Development ViewpointsIn the evaluations of Japan’s ODA to three countries and the thematic evaluation, “highly satisfactory” or “satisfactory” ratings were received across all the evaluation criteria: Relevance of Policies, Effectiveness of Results, and Appropriateness of Processes. The evaluations confirmed that these ODA policies were consistent with Japan’s high-level policies and the needs of the partner countries, that Japan’s cooperation contributed to resolving the development issues faced by the partner countries, and that policy formulation and implementation were carried out through appropriate processes. Evaluation from Diplomatic ViewpointsSince 2015, all of MOFA’s ODA evaluations have included evaluation from Diplomatic Viewpoints, which assesses the effects of ODA on Japan’s national interests. The evaluation criteria consist of “Diplomatic Importance” (why the ODA is important to Japan’s national interests) and “Diplomatic Impact” (how the ODA contributed to Japan’s national interests). In the evaluation of grant aid projects implemented by MOFA, as a result of the analysis conducted in FY2020, Summary of MOFA ODA Evaluations in FY2021
元のページ ../index.html#6