JICA, on the other hand, mainly evaluates the individual projects that it is responsible for implementing.In Japan, ODA policies are planned and formulated by MOFA, while the implementation of individual ODA projects is primarily the responsibility of the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). ODA evaluation is conducted through mutual collaboration between MOFA and JICA with different roles.Currently, MOFA primarily evaluates ODA policies by commissioning third parties such as external experts and consultants. MOFA also assists partner countries in enhancing their evaluation capabilities.It is important that the results and recommendations obtained from ODA evaluations be taken seriously by relevant parties such as MOFA, which is responsible for planning and formulating ODA policies, and JICA, which is responsible for implementing individual projects, and that they be utilized for formulating ODA policies and implementing ODA projects.Accordingly, once It is through this process that MOFA promotes ODA management and ensures public accountability, which are the objectives of ODA evaluation.the evaluation is completed, evaluators report the results and their recommendations directly to MOFA officials. In the next fiscal year, MOFA and JICA work together to formulate specific actions in response to the recommendations. Then, two fiscal years after the evaluation, MOFA checks the implementation status of these response actions and publishes the results in its annual evaluation report.Japan conducted separately from evaluations based on the GPEA.Japan promotes development cooperation in order to contribute to securing the peace, stability, and prosperity of the international community. Official Development Assistance (ODA) is public funding for this purpose, and ODA evaluation is the task of assessing and analyzing the implementation status and effects of ODA.ODA evaluation has two objectives. The first is to improve ODA management and make ODA more effective and efficient by investigating its implementation status and effects. The second is to ensure public accountability as well as to gain public understanding and support by publishing the evaluation results.Japan has steadily conducted ODA evaluations since 1975, prior to the enforcement of the Government Policy Evaluations Act (GPEA) in 2002. It has developed its evaluation methodologies based on not only actual practices but also the evaluation criteria of international institutions engaged in ODA, including the Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD-DAC).This Annual Report gives an overview of the ODA evaluations by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) of In the firstfiscal yearfiscal yearTwo fiscalyears laterNextEvaluation report completed/publishedActions formulated in responseto recommendationsResponse actions finalized/publishedReflectedReflectedin ODAin ODApoliciespoliciesestablishmentsImplementation status ofresponse actions checked/publishedResponses byResponses byResponses byimplementingimplementingoverseasagenciesagencies Implementation Framework Utilization of ODA Evaluation Results03Annual Report on Japan’s ODA Evaluation 2022 What is ODA Evaluation?
元のページ ../index.html#4