Evaluation of Japan's Non-Project Grant Aid for Provision of Japanese Next-Generation Eco-Friendly Vehicles to Peru in FY 2013Satisfactory BSatisfactory BHighly Satisfactory APolicy levelRelevance of Policies (Projects)Effectiveness of ResultsAppropriateness of ProcessesRatings from Development Viewpoints*Third-party ODA evaluationEvaluation of Japan's ODA to the Republic of the PhilippinesEvaluation of Grant Assistance for Japanese NGO ProjectsEvaluation of Japan's ODA for Women's EmpowermentEvaluation of the SATREPS Program (Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development)Country Assistance EvaluationThematic/ Aid Modality EvaluationHighly Satisfactory AHighly Satisfactory AHighly Satisfactory AHighly Satisfactory AHighly Satisfactory ASatisfactory BHighly Satisfactory AHighly Satisfactory ASatisfactory BSatisfactory BSatisfactory BSatisfactory BClassicationProject levelEvaluation of Individual Projects Under Grant Aid * Rating scaleHighly Satisfactory AAll evaluation questions have highly satisfactory results.Satisfactory BMost evaluation questions have highly satisfactory results.Partially Unsatisfactory CSome evaluation questions have highly satisfactory results, although there are some issues to be resolved.Unsatisfactory DMost evaluation questions do not have satisfactory results.Summary of the FY 2019 MOFA ODA EvaluationsMOFA uses a rating scale to assess development effectiveness, aiming to produce clear and comprehensible evaluation reports.In FY 2017, MOFA adopted an alphabetical rating scale (A to D).This alphabetical scale may make the evaluation results easier to understand, but it can also be misleading due to its simplicity. Therefore, we recommend that readers refer to the summary of each evaluation result.Evaluations from Development Viewpoints11
元のページ ../index.html#12